Construction labor unions have scored a major regulatory victory as the U.S. Dept. of Laborâ€™s long-awaited final rule on apprenticeships retains the construction industryâ€™s exclusion from new â€śindustry-recognizedâ€ť training and education programs for those seeking to enter its workforce.
That exclusion had divided the construction industry, with the building trades and some specialty-contractor groups supporting it and two of the largest contractor associations opposing it.
DOL says that the overall aim of its new rule, announced on March 10, is to expand the use of apprenticeships in industries where such training programs arenâ€™t greatly used.
To achieve that goal, the regulation calls for allowing companies, industry groups, educational institutions, unions and other entities to set up and operate Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs (IRAPs).
Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia said in a statement, â€śThis new rule offers employers, community colleges and others a flexible, innovative way to quickly expand apprenticeships in telecommunications, health care, cybersecurity and other sectors where apprenticeships currently are not widely available.â€ť
The Labor Dept. said the new rule would take effect on May 11.
For construction, the key issue related to the regulation was whether DOL would keep the industryâ€™s current exemption from a central provision of the rule.
That provision is establishment of IRAPs, which would take on responsibilities for much of the apprenticeship standard-setting that DOL and state agencies now handle.
The rule also would let companies, industry groups and other organizations apply to DOL to become Standards Recognition Entities (SREs). The SREs would determine the standards for the IRAPsâ€™ training and curricula in specific industries or business sectors. SREs would be subject to DOL oversight.
That would be a significant change from the current Registered Apprenticeship system, in which DOL or state agencies register and validate apprentices and apprenticeship programs.
Wave of comments
The department published a proposed rule last June and was inundated by more than 327,000 comments on that proposal. DOL said the total was the largest its Employment and Training Administration had ever received for a proposed regulation. It added that a majority of the comments were related to "form letter campaigns."
The building trades unions strongly supported keeping the exemption and also wanted to make it permanent.
Sean McGarvey, president of North America's Building Trades Unions, said last summer that nearly 325,000 of the comments supported the unions' position.
Contractor groups that have joint apprenticeship programs and other relationships with the unions, such as the National Electrical Contractors Association, Mechanical Contractors Association of America and Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association, also supported keeping the exemption.
Those opposing the exclusion were contractor groups such as the Associated General Contractors of America and Associated Builders and Contractors. They argued that construction has a major shortage of skilled labor and that IRAPs would provide a way to help ease that problem.
No 'sunset' for exclusion
In the end, the Labor Dept. came down on the side of the unions. In the rule, the department said that it â€śhas determined that programs that seek to train apprentices to perform construction activitiesâ€¦will not be recognized as IRAPs.â€ť DOL also decided not to include a â€śsunsetâ€ť provision, that would end the construction exemption after a certain period of time.
It added, â€śThe departmentâ€™s goal in this rulemaking is to expand apprenticeships to new industry sectors and occupations.
DOL noted, â€śRegistered apprenticeship programs are more widespread and well-established in the construction sector than in any other sector.â€ť
Labor Dept. statistics show that in fiscal year 2018, construction had 166,629 active apprentices, the largest total among industries. Ranking second is the military, with 98,435. Construction's total did decline 5% from the 2017 level.